I was with two colleagues tonight, and after a late-night snack, we were about to leave Central, heading for the subway. “You know what I love about Central?” asked one of my colleagues, so ready to give us the answer. “You see so many birds,” he said. “Good birds. Not just local birds.”
By ‘birds’ he meant women who go out on a Saturday night dawning strategic outfits that reveal their shapely body parts. I thought of the cut-out models from mainstream fashion magazines and entertainment tabloids.
I also caught his meaning of how local women are rather unattractive, which, I would disagree, for I have come across the occasional lady who wears her local earthly energy with such grace and charm.
I thought of the troubled narrator, Podznyshev, in Tolstoy’s “The Kreutzer Sonata”. In it, the narrator (perhaps Tolstoy himself), makes the following observation:
It’s an astonishing thing how complete the illusion can be that beauty is the good. A beautiful woman says stupid things, you listen and don’t see the stupidity, you see intelligence. She says and does vile things, and you see something sweet. And when she doesn’t say stupid or vile things, but is beautiful, you think she’s a marvel of intelligence and morality.
I have always kept the position that it is difficult to see the true essence of a person if one only looks at the appearance. I have experienced the irritation of having to converse with a woman whose appearance and physical exposition challenges my control over where I look, and more irritating if this woman is aware of her power and is using it knowingly. This is when a voice inside of me reminds me to neither be taken aback nor be moved by the tricks. It is a power struggle. And too often, men submit. I’d like to think I have too much pride. Yes, I just have too much pride. I would rather forgo the opportunity to glance over a body that society deems beautiful than to allow the owner of the body to arrive at some kind of success (as she may see it as such) for having ‘enchanted’ me.
Podznychev also says the following:
A woman is happy and achieves everything she can desire when she enchants a man.
For me, if I know this is what she is trying to do, I’d say, I see your tricks, and your tricks are nothing new. Rather, the woman who doesn’t try, the woman whose appearance is different from the beauty defined in the mainstream catalogue, who yet carries a lightness that seems like she has attained a certain grace without effort, who sits in the corner of a restaurant sipping lemon tea – that, I may find very captivating.
But you see, the difference is, in the latter case, it is I who detect her, whereas in the former example, she is the one who puts on a front to enchant me. I prefer to be the active participant. But does it suggest that I prefer my women to be passive, and that really, even with my criticism of contemporary views on beauty, I am still, really, a traditionalist?
The best part of going to Central is seeing the birds --- I compare my colleague’s comment to Podznyshev’s fear.
…I always felt awkward, eerie, when I saw a woman decked out in a ball gown, but now I’m downright scared, I see something downright dangerous for people and against the law¸I want to call the police, to ask for protection against the danger, to demand that the dangerous object be taken away, removed.
The narrator also asks society the following question.
Why is gambling forbidden, while women in prostitutionous, sensuality-arousing costumes are not? They’re a thousand times more dangerous!
I see how a strategically revealing outfit can be dangerous, but I wouldn’t go so far to say that we need to have them removed. I think women can choose to wear whatever they want as long as they are being themselves and not what society wants them to be. As I say this, the Miss Hong Kong beauty pageant is being televised. The women contestants are numbered 1 to 10 (I think there are ten of them), and each woman, when it is her turn, does a much-practiced catwalk across the stage while holding a smile and moving her arms as if she was a blooming flower. If, as a man watching this, I feel offended, as a woman, would I not be outraged?